This topic has been archived. It cannot be replied.
-
枫下茶话 / 社会 / 婚姻本来就是异性之间的事, 我认为改变婚姻定义和人权无关.
-chiliant(辣蚂蚁);
2005-5-26
{638}
(#2314961@0)
-
one reason to give homo the right to get married, is financial protection.
-babyface(★Million-$-Baby★);
2005-5-26
(#2314963@0)
-
Common-law, or "garrage", has the same legal effect of protection though.
-chiliant(辣蚂蚁);
2005-5-26
(#2314970@0)
-
给你举个例子,A、B是同性恋,共同生活五年,A有外遇,卷走家里全部财产,请问没有婚姻,怎么保护B?别说人家活该,那就是歧视了。
-ekati(网友);
2005-5-27
(#2316734@0)
-
A is a man or a /woman, B is a dog. A and B live for 5 years. One day, A left, can B have all the inheritence? Marriage is between one MAN and one WOMAN. PERIOD.
-northtorontorian(Uptowner);
2005-5-28
(#2317421@0)
-
You and your brother live together for 5 years(assuing you are a Man). When you and your brother break up, should you or your brother inherient from each other? That's ABSURD!
-northtorontorian(Uptowner);
2005-5-28
(#2317424@0)
-
北多人,你不看贴,我就没法给你回帖了。别人不是讲了人和动物的区别吗? 人权是人的权。这里讲的权利不光是继承权,你中文水平??? 讲的是婚姻的保护作用。。。
-ekati(网友);
2005-5-28
(#2317454@0)
-
婚姻最主要的作用是延续后代, 保护后代, 现在可好, 改成了保护财产, 上帝们哪天都得从天堂跳下来
-honey_well(honeywell);
2005-5-28
(#2317508@0)
-
如果是这样你生完孩子,孩子成人你就婚姻自动解除,行吗?人家不生孩子的,你不让人家结婚?
-ekati(网友);
2005-5-28
(#2317686@0)
-
私人财产不可侵犯,如果他拿走你的财产,那就是偷盗,法律可以管的.
-diver();
2005-5-28
(#2317593@0)
-
孩子你还没结婚吧,你LP和你的财产能分得清?那电视是你的还是她的?
-ekati(网友);
2005-5-28
(#2317664@0)